低利率周期国债定价的范式转换:驱动因子变迁与非线性效应

Paradigm Shift in Chinese Government Bond Pricing in the Low-Interest Era: Evolving Drivers and Nonlinear Effects

  • 摘要: 随着中国利率持续走低且低利率成为新常态,国债市场定价逻辑正经历深刻重构。本文基于不同利率周期样本,结合线性回归与神经网络方法,识别国债影响因素的差异与时变特征。研究发现:在正常利率周期下,黄金价格、汇率与股指是国债价格变动的主要驱动力,而利率影响不显著;在低利率周期下,利率对国债价格变动的影响力显著回升。神经网络分析进一步揭示,低利率环境下黄金价格对国债指数呈非线性影响:初期推动上涨,但超过临界值后转为抑制上涨;降息短期内导致国债指数小幅回落,但随着政策深入将触发其加速上行。研究表明,低利率周期下利率敏感性急剧增强,极大地限制了货币政策空间,同时黄金价格、汇率等外部变量作用凸显。本文为投资者识别周期转换中的风险与机遇提供了新见解,也为政策制定者完善宏观审慎框架提供了关键依据。

     

    Abstract: Against the backdrop of China's transition into a “new normal” of sustained low interest rates,its government bond market—now the world's second-largest—has witnessed unprecedented expansion (with outstanding bonds surging from RMB 23.27 trillion in 2021 to RMB 34.57 trillion by the end of 2024) alongside heightened price volatility. This volatility has exposed the failure of traditional pricing mechanisms,as conventional linear models and single-cycle analyses can no longer capture the market's evolving logic. Addressing this critical gap,this study systematically explores the structural transformation of government bond pricing drivers and their nonlinear effects across interest rate cycles,delivering both theoretical breakthroughs and practical insights. This study clearly distinguishes between “normal-interest-rate periods” and “low-interest-rate periods” using a globally accepted criterion:a sustained overnight Shanghai Interbank Offered Rate (SHIBOR) below 2%. Drawing on daily data of key financial indicators from March 2018 to April 2025,it splits the sample into two phases:the normal-interest-rate period (March 2018–September 2023) and the low-interest-rate period (October 2023-April 2025). This division effectively captures China's first-ever sustained low-interest cycle,which is driven by cumulative monetary easing measures. The dependent variable in the study is the CSI Long-Term Government Bond Index,a representative indicator of China's government bond market. Independent variables include SHIBOR (reflecting market liquidity and funding costs),the onshore RMB index (indicating cross-border capital flows),the gold index (representing safe-haven demand),the crude oil index (linked to inflation expectations),and the Shanghai Composite Index (reflecting market risk appetite). Methodologically,the study adopts an innovative hybrid approach:it uses linear regression (including cointegration tests and correlation analysis) to identify linear relationships between variables across different interest rate cycles,and an artificial neural network (ANN) — equipped with a hyperbolic tangent activation function and the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm — to capture complex nonlinear relationships. This hybrid method overcomes the limitations of traditional linear analysis frameworks. One of the study's most notable findings is the cyclical dependence of government bond pricing drivers. In the normal-interest-rate period,interest rates lose their explanatory power for bond prices (showing no stable cointegration with bond prices),while gold,the exchange rates,and the stock index emerge as the dominant driving factors. In contrast,the low-interest-rate period triggers a paradigm shift:interest rates reemerge as a critical factor with a negative impact on bond prices,and the hierarchy of driving factors becomes gold>interest rates>exchange rates. Crude oil exerts a weak negative impact in both cycles,while the stock index maintains a consistently mildnegative effect on bond prices. Results from the ANN further reveal significant nonlinear effects that linear models fail to capture. For gold:initially,rising gold prices drive up bond prices,but this driving effect diminishes gradually; once gold prices exceed a certain threshold,gold's safe-haven attribute shifts toward a speculative one,thereby suppressing bond prices. For interest rates:short-term interest rate cuts lead to a slight decline in bond prices,attributed to “liquidity trap expectations”; however,deeper interest rate cuts trigger accelerated growth in bond prices as investors adjust their expectations. Overall,the ANN achieves far higher fitting accuracy than linear regression,demonstrating its superiority in capturing complex market dynamics. In terms of theoretical innovation,this study is the first to formally define China's low-interest cycle and systematically compare the drivers of government bond pricing across different interest rate cycles. This fills a gap in existing literature,which often overlooks structural changes in pricing mechanisms across cycles. Additionally,the study extends multi-factor asset pricing theory by integrating nonlinear dynamics,proving that the “importance of pricing factors” is not static but varies with changes in the interest rate environment.By combining linear regression (for baseline associations) with ANN (for nonlinearity),the study overcomes the limitations of single-method approaches,providing a more holistic toolkit for analyzing complex fixed-income markets. For investors,it identifies actionable thresholds (e.g.,gold's 2,800 level) and rate-cut dynamics to avoid nonlinear risks. For policymakers,it warns that low interest rates sharply increase bond market sensitivity to rates,narrowing conventional monetary policy space,and highlights the need to monitor gold and exchange rates as systemic risk transmitters. In conclusion,this study reshapes our understanding of Chinese government bond pricing,proving that the market's logic undergoes a paradigm shift in low-interest environments. Its findings are not only academically significant for global fixed-income research but also practically critical for safeguarding China's financial stability amid monetary easing.

     

/

返回文章
返回